The Meticulous Abstractions of Tomma Abts: A Study in Precision and Perception... A Well Rounded Critique of Her Oeuvre
- Ahmed Kheder
- Apr 17
- 5 min read
Updated: Apr 23
Tomma Abts, a German-born, London-based painter, has become a significant and enigmatic figure in contemporary abstract art. Known for her small-scale, tightly composed works, Abts crafts paintings that are both visually intricate and conceptually restrained. Her practice—marked by methodical layering, geometric rigor, and a unique resistance to external narrative—creates a visual language that is unmistakably her own.
An Exploration of The Abstractions of Tomma Abts
A Singular Format: Consistency as a Framework for Exploration
One of the most distinctive aspects of Abts’ practice is her unwavering commitment to a single canvas size: 48 x 38 cm (approximately 19 x 15 inches). Each painting is given a title from a dictionary of German first names, imbuing it with a kind of anonymous personality while sidestepping any direct figurative interpretation. This self-imposed constraint serves as a conceptual and physical boundary that paradoxically opens up infinite compositional possibilities. Within this intimate scale, she builds her visual worlds with slow precision, often taking months to complete a single work.
Process: Intuition Meets Structure
Abts does not begin with a preconceived image or design. Her process is intuitive and evolutionary. Each painting starts from scratch, without sketches or references, and develops layer by layer as she responds to what appears on the canvas. This method is as much about uncovering as it is about constructing. Shapes are built up and then sometimes erased or painted over, leaving subtle traces of earlier decisions. The result is a visual archaeology: pentimenti and buried forms whisper beneath the surface.
Her technique, although painstaking, is not clinical. The brushstrokes are exact but never mechanical. Her surfaces often show the physicality of paint—a balance of flat opacity and textured relief that reflects both depth and tactility. Shadows and highlights suggest three-dimensionality, yet the compositions resist a definitive reading of space, hovering somewhere between illusion and flatness.
Form and Color: A Tense Harmony
Abts’ paintings are geometric but not mathematical. She employs arcs, wedges, lines, and bands that twist and intersect in ways that feel both precise and irrational. These forms are often organized into internal systems that seem on the verge of collapsing or resolving—a perpetual tension that energizes the work.
Color plays a vital role in this dynamic. Abts uses a muted, often unconventional palette—mustard yellows, grey-greens, dusky purples, and brick reds—that diverges from the saturated hues traditionally associated with abstract painting. The colors are built slowly through repeated layering, creating subtle modulations and a dense, almost sculptural surface. Often, color is deployed not just aesthetically but structurally: it defines shape, suggests depth, and guides the viewer’s eye through the pictorial space.
Beyond Modernism: Abts’ Rejection of Grand Narratives
Although her work nods to the traditions of Constructivism, Op Art, and Minimalism, Abts diverges sharply from their utopian ambitions or optical bravado. Her paintings are not about transcendence or progress but about a private, interior logic. They have more in common with drawing or writing than with grand modernist gestures. Each piece functions as a kind of visual puzzle—self-contained, self-referential, and almost hermetically sealed.
Her rejection of expressive or autobiographical content also marks her as a painter of a different kind of rigor. There is no drama, no overt emotion, no reference to the external world. And yet, her works are deeply human—precise but fallible, controlled but vulnerable. They invite prolonged looking and reward close attention, offering a meditative experience that stands in stark contrast to the fast pace of contemporary visual culture.
Recognition and Influence
In 2006, Abts was awarded the Turner Prize, becoming the first woman painter to receive the honor. The award marked a broader recognition of abstraction as a viable and vital mode of contemporary art-making, even in an era dominated by conceptual and media-based practices. Since then, her influence has only grown, especially among younger artists interested in abstraction that is process-driven, formally rigorous, and materially rich.
Abts has exhibited internationally, with major shows at institutions like the Serpentine Gallery in London, the Art Institute of Chicago, and the Museum of Modern Art in New York. Despite—or perhaps because of—her quiet consistency, she remains a unique voice in the art world: a painter's painter, deeply respected for her integrity, focus, and contribution to the evolving discourse of abstraction.
A Well Rounded Critique of Tomma Abts' Paintings
A Formula of Stagnancy
Abts’ paintings adhere to the same format: 48 x 38 cm, portrait orientation, with subdued tones and overlapped geometric shapes that appear to fold in on themselves. The supposed "discipline" of this format is often cited as a style coherency. From another view point, this dimensional stability refers to a formula stagnancy without a real artistic experimentation. Her work is imprisoned by its own rigidity. There is no sense of adaptability with the concept she is trying to deliver to her viewers' emotions. No ambition. No desire to engage beyond the self-imposed rules of a narrow conceptual framework.
Lack of spontaneity
Lack of spontaneity is the major disadvantage of the style Abts adheres to in her work. Spontaneity—whether conveyed through chaotic brushstrokes, a bold color palette, or high contrast between light and shadow—is the foundation of a unique artistic voice. A spontaneous style can shout, pushing the artist's creation into the realm of genuine expression. It allows a painting to connect with viewers on an emotional level and deliver its philosophical message smoothly to the heart.
Spontaneity is audacity. Without it, the paintings neither speak nor whisper. One might argue that the geometric abstraction is contemplative, but artistic stagnancy feels anemic, inert, and emotionally disengaged. There’s a fine line between maintaining coherence within a collection and slipping into timidity—and Abts often falls on the wrong side.
Shallow Conceptual Depth
Abts' interplay of linear folds, ribbons, and gradients may be executed with care, but they build toward a shallow conceptual determinations. The paintings lack narrative, symbolism, iconography—anything to pull the viewer into a world beyond the surface.
The use of trompe l’oeil shadows and layered effects is technically clever, but the cleverness is its own dead end without a real deep philosophical message to depict. Once you notice the illusionism, there's nowhere else to go. Her work offer no space for emotional interpretation, no challenges for ethical and religious boundaries. There is nothing to feel here—just a maze with no exit.
Redundancy and Repetition
Geometric abstraction started in the 1920's by Wassily Kandinsky as a way to reflect theosophical ideology and deliver the teachings of Helena Blavatsky's book "The Secret Doctrine" to the viewers on an emotional artistic vehicle.
What was shocking at the early 20th century is now redundant and repetitive. What Abts doing is actually like trying to recreate the wheel, without a shocking value geometric abstraction looks fading, redundant and exhausted.
Conclusion: The Power of Restraint
Tomma Abts’ paintings remind us of the power of restraint. In an age that often rewards spectacle and scale, her compact canvases speak in a quieter, more deliberate language. They ask for time, for attention, for contemplation. And in return, they offer a glimpse into a world where meaning emerges slowly, form by form, as much from what is hidden as from what is revealed.
In the precise edges, subtle shifts, and layered depths of her work, Abts continues to challenge what painting can be—not by reinventing it, but by refining it, again and again, within the boundaries of her own idiosyncratic system.
Comments